Pemetaan Bibliometrik dengan VOSviewer terhadap Pengetahuan Lokal Mitigasi Bencana
Abstrak
Pemetaan bibliometrik dapat menggambarkan variasi informasi mengenai pengetahuan lokal dalam upaya mengurangi dampak bencana. Walaupun telah banyak yang membahas pemetaan bibliometrik, penelitian mengenai pengetahuan lokal dalam konteks mitigasi bencana masih sangat terbatas. Metode penelitian. Metode bibliometrik dengan pendekatan kuantitatif diterapkan melalui basis data Scopus dengan rentang 2019-2023 dan visualisasi VOSviewer. Teknik pemetaan dilakukan dengan analisis co-citation dan visualisasi network dan density. Data analisis. Terdapat 98 dokumen yang mengutip dua penelitian secara bersamaan. Penelitian yang dikutip paling banyak membahas pengetahuan lokal untuk kesiapsiagaan bencana dan integrasi pengetahuan pribumi dengan sains untuk reduksi risiko bencana. Hasil dan Pembahasan. Pola hubungan penelitian menghasilkan 8 klaster dengan fokus topik yang berbeda-beda, mulai dari integrasi pengetahuan pribumi dan pengetahuan ilmiah dalam ketahanan bencana, manajemen risiko bencana, hingga partisipasi komunitas.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Referensi
Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, & Education, M. of E. M. (2021). Global Natural Disaster Assessment Report 2021. UN Annual Report, (October), 1–80. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/2021-global-natural-disaster-assessment-report
Erwina, W., & Yulianti. (2016). The Application of Indigenous Knowledge in Information Literacy Model in Higher Education: A Case of Application of Indigenous Knowledge as One of Information Science Studies. International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science, (April 2016), 291–299. Library and Information Management Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University.
Fatmala, F. D. A., & Sopiah. (2023). A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of transactional leadership. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 3(01), 104–117. Retrieved from https://aksiologi.org/index.php/praja/article/view/624
Hartman, S. (2018). Resilient tourism destinations? Governance implications of bringing theories of resilience and adaptive capacity to tourism practice. Destination Resilience, (February), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701904-5
Masni, M. (2020). A Bibliometric Study on Students’ Theses at the Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar. Literatify : Trends in Library Developments, 1(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.24252/literatify.v1i1.13159
Mechler, R. (2016). Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis. Natural Hazards, 81(3), 2121–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2170-y
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Ragadhita, R., Al Husaeni, D. N., & Nugraha, W. C. (2023). Research trend on the use of mercury in gold mining: Literature review and bibliometric analysis. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v%vi%i.36576
Niekerk, D. Van, Nemakonde, L. D., Kruger, L., & Genade, K. (2017). Community-Based Disaster Risk Management. (November). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4
Rahayu, S., & Saleh, A. R. (2017). Studi Bibliometrik dan Sebaran Topik Penelitian pada Jurnal Hayati Terbitan 2012-2016. Pustakaloka, 9(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v9i2.1092
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sularso, Octavianus, & Suryono. (2021). Mitigasi risiko bencana banjir di Manado. Jurnal Spasial, 8(2), 267–274.
United Nations. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 203.
United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). 2022 Disasters in Numbers. EM-DAT | The International Disasters Database, 8. Retrieved from https://www.emdat.be/
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). USING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGES FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-sa4.footer##By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License